![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Claimant was last employed on 5/27/2004
2. The Claimant's job title was Senior Advisor
3. The Claimant was discharged for: rules violations
4. The Claimant was working at the time of the incident which caused the separation
5. Prior warning was not given before the separation.
6. The Claimant's conduct was not serious enough that a dismissal was warranted without a warning.
7. The rules that the Claimant violated do not rise to the level of willful misconduct.
In other words -- suck it, Step-by-Step, unemployment compensation for me!
1. The Claimant was last employed on 5/27/2004
2. The Claimant's job title was Senior Advisor
3. The Claimant was discharged for: rules violations
4. The Claimant was working at the time of the incident which caused the separation
5. Prior warning was not given before the separation.
6. The Claimant's conduct was not serious enough that a dismissal was warranted without a warning.
7. The rules that the Claimant violated do not rise to the level of willful misconduct.
In other words -- suck it, Step-by-Step, unemployment compensation for me!
Current Mood: 
pleased
pleased8 comments | Leave a comment
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}