Now I don't agree. See, the "wang" word changes were giggly-immature partly because of the direct phallic references and partly because the term "wang" is a cutesy-stupid word that is immature-funny by itself. The "pants" references are a little more indirect, and the term itself is not immature-funny. Many of these don't even refer to genitalia ("I find your lack of pants disturbing," "I am altering the pants. Pray that I don't alter them any further," "I don't think the Empire had wookiees in mind when they designed pants").

My conclusion is that though this link is pretty gigglingly-immature, your previous one was more so.